International Contest 2025 (INLG 2025)

Open the contest page →

Official Results (Awards)

AwardTeam
5-player village: Best win rateCanisLupus
5-player village: Best human evaluationsunamelli
5-player village: Human evaluation, 2ndyharada
13-player village: Top win ratesunamelli-c
13-player village: Top win ratekanolab-nw-B

Results and awards were presented at the AIWolfDial 2025 workshop (October 30, 2025, INLG 2025, Hanoi).

Win Rates

Computed from the logs of all games that finished normally in the main competition. "Overall" is wins divided by games. Per-role cells show the win rate in that role with (wins / games). "Adjusted" re-weights the per-role win rates by the village's role composition, cancelling out uneven role assignments.

5-player village (120 games)

#TeamGamesOverallVillagerSeerPossessedWerewolfAdjusted
1CanisLupus7367.1%66.7% (18/27)81.2% (13/16)42.9% (6/14)75.0% (12/16)66.5%
2kanolab-nw7562.7%73.3% (22/30)60.0% (9/15)66.7% (10/15)40.0% (6/15)62.7%
3sunamelli7560.0%67.7% (21/31)66.7% (10/15)50.0% (7/14)46.7% (7/15)59.8%
4CamelliaDragons7553.3%61.3% (19/31)57.1% (8/14)37.5% (6/16)50.0% (7/14)53.4%
5GPTaku7746.8%53.3% (16/30)62.5% (10/16)33.3% (5/15)31.2% (5/16)46.8%
6yharada7446.0%50.0% (15/30)64.3% (9/14)37.5% (6/16)28.6% (4/14)46.1%
7mille7744.2%60.0% (18/30)33.3% (5/15)37.5% (6/16)31.2% (5/16)44.4%
8Character-Lab7435.1%41.9% (13/31)46.7% (7/15)21.4% (3/14)21.4% (3/14)34.7%

13-player village (13 games)

#TeamGamesOverallVillagerSeerBodyguardMediumPossessedWerewolfAdjusted
1kanolab-nw-B1361.5%16.7% (1/6)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (3/3)61.5%
2sunamelli-b1361.5%33.3% (2/6)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (3/3)61.5%
3sunamelli-c1361.5%42.9% (3/7)-100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (3/3)63.1%
4mille-B1346.2%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)46.2%
5kanolab-nw-C1346.2%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (3/3)46.2%
6kanolab-nw-A1346.2%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)46.2%
7CanisLupus-A1346.2%40.0% (2/5)50.0% (1/2)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)45.4%
8CamelliaDragons1346.2%50.0% (3/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)46.2%
9CanisLupus-B1346.2%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)46.2%
10Character-Lab-B1330.8%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)66.7% (2/3)30.8%
11sunamelli-a1330.8%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)66.7% (2/3)30.8%
12mille-A1315.4%0.0% (0/6)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)33.3% (1/3)15.4%
13Character-Lab-A1315.4%16.7% (1/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/3)15.4%

Game Metrics

Behavioural metrics computed mechanically from the game logs, independent of dialogue quality. Each value is a ratio against what random play would produce (1.00 = random). "Executed", "divined" and "guarded" show how often the team was targeted relative to chance; lower is better for being executed or divined. "Divination accuracy" and "vote accuracy" show how often the team found a werewolf relative to chance; higher is better. "Possessed avoidance" is the rate at which, as the possessed, the team voted for someone other than a werewolf.

5-player village

TeamExecutedDivinedDivination accuracyVote accuracyPossessed avoidance
CanisLupus0.850.711.691.730.61
kanolab-nw0.800.921.401.710.74
sunamelli0.720.850.371.280.73
CamelliaDragons1.041.031.351.200.58
GPTaku1.391.091.201.130.60
yharada0.920.851.881.200.71
mille1.231.361.041.350.56
Character-Lab1.141.230.970.600.70

13-player village

TeamExecutedDivinedGuardedDivination accuracyVote accuracyPossessed avoidance
kanolab-nw-B0.190.641.391.721.37-
sunamelli-b0.390.630.721.251.471.00
sunamelli-c0.670.530.83-1.640.75
mille-B2.891.501.964.000.921.00
kanolab-nw-C0.580.570.761.841.391.00
kanolab-nw-A0.721.612.08-1.381.00
CanisLupus-A0.470.76-0.651.591.00
CamelliaDragons3.450.932.45-1.34-
CanisLupus-B1.171.000.84-1.421.00
Character-Lab-B0.561.640.91-0.74-
sunamelli-a0.671.080.34-1.030.50
mille-A2.690.880.442.320.96-
Character-Lab-A1.301.401.630.700.201.00

Human Evaluation (Relative)

Human judges read selected game logs and evaluate the players of each game on each criterion. From 2024 winter onward the judges rank the players (average rank, lower is better); in the 2024 spring and 2024 international contests they gave 5-point scores (higher is better). In 13-player villages each entry (e.g. team-A, team-B) is evaluated separately.

5-player village

10 selected games. Average ranks (lower is better).

#TeamNatural expressionContextual dialogueLogical consistencyAction consistencyCharacter consistencyAverage
1sunamelli2.172.082.002.252.542.21
2yharada2.122.252.383.332.582.53
3CanisLupus3.002.882.962.422.382.73
4kanolab-nw3.122.752.882.502.672.78
5GPTaku2.542.893.072.573.182.85
6CamelliaDragons3.123.082.883.043.123.05
7Character-Lab3.673.623.383.253.083.40
8mille4.144.254.254.364.324.26

13-player village

10 selected games. Average ranks (lower is better).

#TeamNatural expressionContextual dialogueLogical consistencyAction consistencyCharacter consistencyTeam playAverage
1sunamelli-b3.953.904.174.005.504.804.39
2sunamelli-c3.853.904.384.655.834.604.54
3sunamelli-a4.004.384.674.674.905.004.60
4CanisLupus-A6.085.004.884.285.174.554.99
5CanisLupus-B5.535.405.675.156.425.205.56
6kanolab-nw-A6.175.906.306.154.835.205.76
7kanolab-nw-C7.286.427.006.334.675.426.19
8kanolab-nw-B6.586.906.886.924.907.176.56
9Character-Lab-B6.756.806.727.307.177.006.96
10Character-Lab-A7.477.837.458.357.207.907.70
11mille-A10.4510.7210.3510.0510.8210.4010.46
12mille-B10.0710.8510.0710.4310.6510.9510.50
13CamelliaDragons10.8212.8811.8212.7212.8012.7512.30

LLM-as-a-Judge (Relative Evaluation)

LLM judges rank the players of each game on each evaluation criterion; the ranks are averaged per team (lower is better). The judge models differ by contest and are listed under each track. The judge is published as aiwolf-nlp-llm-judge.

5-player village

Judge models: GPT-4o・GPT-5 の 2 モデル平均(本戦全ゲーム)

#TeamNatural expressionContextual dialogueLogical consistencyAction consistencyCharacter consistencyAverage
1sunamelli2.272.332.432.172.732.39
2yharada1.811.952.423.102.662.39
3Character-Lab3.162.292.712.992.242.68
4kanolab-nw3.012.973.232.752.152.82
5CamelliaDragons3.043.102.873.273.013.06
6CanisLupus3.543.533.052.753.103.19
7GPTaku3.063.453.553.013.443.30
8mille4.084.323.693.934.604.12

13-player village

Judge models: GPT-4o・GPT-5 の 2 モデル平均(本戦全ゲーム)

#TeamNatural expressionContextual dialogueLogical consistencyAction consistencyCharacter consistencyTeam playAverage
1sunamelli-b4.084.385.465.426.235.775.22
2sunamelli-c4.314.815.505.736.125.385.31
3CanisLupus-A6.005.885.314.505.354.885.32
4sunamelli-a5.235.275.624.737.385.545.63
5kanolab-nw-B5.775.817.507.044.006.196.05
6kanolab-nw-A6.355.887.156.855.156.086.24
7CanisLupus-B6.506.086.506.126.466.196.31
8kanolab-nw-C6.737.127.236.424.965.776.37
9Character-Lab-B5.966.695.967.965.627.196.56
10Character-Lab-A7.086.817.238.196.776.507.10
11mille-B10.0810.319.627.9610.699.779.74
12mille-A10.9610.049.429.0810.1910.049.96
13CamelliaDragons11.9611.928.5011.0012.0811.6911.19

Game Logs

Logs of the main competition. Only games that finished normally are listed.

TrackGamesLogs
5-player village120Log list
13-player village13Log list

Official Results (Awards)

AwardTeam
5-player village: Best win rateCanisLupus
5-player village: Best human evaluationsunamelli
5-player village: Human evaluation, 2ndyharada
13-player village: Top win ratesunamelli-c
13-player village: Top win ratekanolab-nw-B

Results and awards were presented at the AIWolfDial 2025 workshop (October 30, 2025, INLG 2025, Hanoi).

Win Rates

Computed from the logs of all games that finished normally in the main competition. "Overall" is wins divided by games. Per-role cells show the win rate in that role with (wins / games). "Adjusted" re-weights the per-role win rates by the village's role composition, cancelling out uneven role assignments.

5-player village (120 games)

#TeamGamesOverallVillagerSeerPossessedWerewolfAdjusted
1CanisLupus7367.1%66.7% (18/27)81.2% (13/16)42.9% (6/14)75.0% (12/16)66.5%
2kanolab-nw7562.7%73.3% (22/30)60.0% (9/15)66.7% (10/15)40.0% (6/15)62.7%
3sunamelli7560.0%67.7% (21/31)66.7% (10/15)50.0% (7/14)46.7% (7/15)59.8%
4CamelliaDragons7553.3%61.3% (19/31)57.1% (8/14)37.5% (6/16)50.0% (7/14)53.4%
5GPTaku7746.8%53.3% (16/30)62.5% (10/16)33.3% (5/15)31.2% (5/16)46.8%
6yharada7446.0%50.0% (15/30)64.3% (9/14)37.5% (6/16)28.6% (4/14)46.1%
7mille7744.2%60.0% (18/30)33.3% (5/15)37.5% (6/16)31.2% (5/16)44.4%
8Character-Lab7435.1%41.9% (13/31)46.7% (7/15)21.4% (3/14)21.4% (3/14)34.7%

13-player village (13 games)

#TeamGamesOverallVillagerSeerBodyguardMediumPossessedWerewolfAdjusted
1kanolab-nw-B1361.5%16.7% (1/6)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (3/3)61.5%
2sunamelli-b1361.5%33.3% (2/6)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (3/3)61.5%
3sunamelli-c1361.5%42.9% (3/7)-100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (3/3)63.1%
4mille-B1346.2%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)46.2%
5kanolab-nw-C1346.2%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (3/3)46.2%
6kanolab-nw-A1346.2%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)46.2%
7CanisLupus-A1346.2%40.0% (2/5)50.0% (1/2)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)45.4%
8CamelliaDragons1346.2%50.0% (3/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)46.2%
9CanisLupus-B1346.2%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)100.0% (1/1)66.7% (2/3)46.2%
10Character-Lab-B1330.8%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)66.7% (2/3)30.8%
11sunamelli-a1330.8%33.3% (2/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)66.7% (2/3)30.8%
12mille-A1315.4%0.0% (0/6)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)33.3% (1/3)15.4%
13Character-Lab-A1315.4%16.7% (1/6)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)0.0% (0/1)100.0% (1/1)0.0% (0/3)15.4%

Game Metrics

Behavioural metrics computed mechanically from the game logs, independent of dialogue quality. Each value is a ratio against what random play would produce (1.00 = random). "Executed", "divined" and "guarded" show how often the team was targeted relative to chance; lower is better for being executed or divined. "Divination accuracy" and "vote accuracy" show how often the team found a werewolf relative to chance; higher is better. "Possessed avoidance" is the rate at which, as the possessed, the team voted for someone other than a werewolf.

5-player village

TeamExecutedDivinedDivination accuracyVote accuracyPossessed avoidance
CanisLupus0.850.711.691.730.61
kanolab-nw0.800.921.401.710.74
sunamelli0.720.850.371.280.73
CamelliaDragons1.041.031.351.200.58
GPTaku1.391.091.201.130.60
yharada0.920.851.881.200.71
mille1.231.361.041.350.56
Character-Lab1.141.230.970.600.70

13-player village

TeamExecutedDivinedGuardedDivination accuracyVote accuracyPossessed avoidance
kanolab-nw-B0.190.641.391.721.37-
sunamelli-b0.390.630.721.251.471.00
sunamelli-c0.670.530.83-1.640.75
mille-B2.891.501.964.000.921.00
kanolab-nw-C0.580.570.761.841.391.00
kanolab-nw-A0.721.612.08-1.381.00
CanisLupus-A0.470.76-0.651.591.00
CamelliaDragons3.450.932.45-1.34-
CanisLupus-B1.171.000.84-1.421.00
Character-Lab-B0.561.640.91-0.74-
sunamelli-a0.671.080.34-1.030.50
mille-A2.690.880.442.320.96-
Character-Lab-A1.301.401.630.700.201.00

Human Evaluation (Relative)

Human judges read selected game logs and evaluate the players of each game on each criterion. From 2024 winter onward the judges rank the players (average rank, lower is better); in the 2024 spring and 2024 international contests they gave 5-point scores (higher is better). In 13-player villages each entry (e.g. team-A, team-B) is evaluated separately.

5-player village

10 selected games. Average ranks (lower is better).

#TeamNatural expressionContextual dialogueLogical consistencyAction consistencyCharacter consistencyAverage
1sunamelli2.172.082.002.252.542.21
2yharada2.122.252.383.332.582.53
3CanisLupus3.002.882.962.422.382.73
4kanolab-nw3.122.752.882.502.672.78
5GPTaku2.542.893.072.573.182.85
6CamelliaDragons3.123.082.883.043.123.05
7Character-Lab3.673.623.383.253.083.40
8mille4.144.254.254.364.324.26

13-player village

10 selected games. Average ranks (lower is better).

#TeamNatural expressionContextual dialogueLogical consistencyAction consistencyCharacter consistencyTeam playAverage
1sunamelli-b3.953.904.174.005.504.804.39
2sunamelli-c3.853.904.384.655.834.604.54
3sunamelli-a4.004.384.674.674.905.004.60
4CanisLupus-A6.085.004.884.285.174.554.99
5CanisLupus-B5.535.405.675.156.425.205.56
6kanolab-nw-A6.175.906.306.154.835.205.76
7kanolab-nw-C7.286.427.006.334.675.426.19
8kanolab-nw-B6.586.906.886.924.907.176.56
9Character-Lab-B6.756.806.727.307.177.006.96
10Character-Lab-A7.477.837.458.357.207.907.70
11mille-A10.4510.7210.3510.0510.8210.4010.46
12mille-B10.0710.8510.0710.4310.6510.9510.50
13CamelliaDragons10.8212.8811.8212.7212.8012.7512.30

LLM-as-a-Judge (Relative Evaluation)

LLM judges rank the players of each game on each evaluation criterion; the ranks are averaged per team (lower is better). The judge models differ by contest and are listed under each track. The judge is published as aiwolf-nlp-llm-judge.

5-player village

Judge models: GPT-4o・GPT-5 の 2 モデル平均(本戦全ゲーム)

#TeamNatural expressionContextual dialogueLogical consistencyAction consistencyCharacter consistencyAverage
1sunamelli2.272.332.432.172.732.39
2yharada1.811.952.423.102.662.39
3Character-Lab3.162.292.712.992.242.68
4kanolab-nw3.012.973.232.752.152.82
5CamelliaDragons3.043.102.873.273.013.06
6CanisLupus3.543.533.052.753.103.19
7GPTaku3.063.453.553.013.443.30
8mille4.084.323.693.934.604.12

13-player village

Judge models: GPT-4o・GPT-5 の 2 モデル平均(本戦全ゲーム)

#TeamNatural expressionContextual dialogueLogical consistencyAction consistencyCharacter consistencyTeam playAverage
1sunamelli-b4.084.385.465.426.235.775.22
2sunamelli-c4.314.815.505.736.125.385.31
3CanisLupus-A6.005.885.314.505.354.885.32
4sunamelli-a5.235.275.624.737.385.545.63
5kanolab-nw-B5.775.817.507.044.006.196.05
6kanolab-nw-A6.355.887.156.855.156.086.24
7CanisLupus-B6.506.086.506.126.466.196.31
8kanolab-nw-C6.737.127.236.424.965.776.37
9Character-Lab-B5.966.695.967.965.627.196.56
10Character-Lab-A7.086.817.238.196.776.507.10
11mille-B10.0810.319.627.9610.699.779.74
12mille-A10.9610.049.429.0810.1910.049.96
13CamelliaDragons11.9611.928.5011.0012.0811.6911.19

Game Logs

Logs of the main competition. Only games that finished normally are listed.

TrackGamesLogs
5-player village120Log list
13-player village13Log list

How to view logs

Each “Log list” link opens a listing of the logs (.log files) of games that finished normally. A file name starts with the game start time, followed by the names of the participating teams.

  • View in the browser: press “▶ 開く” (open) in the “viewerで見る” (view in viewer) column of the row you want to read. aiwolf-nlp-viewer opens with that log loaded.
  • Save a file: press “⬇ 保存” (save) in the “ダウンロード” (download) column to download the log file. Clicking the file name shows the raw text of the log instead.
  • Save a whole folder: go one level up via “Parent directory/” and press “⬇ zip” in the row of the folder (e.g. success). All files in the folder are zipped in your browser and downloaded (a dialog confirms the number of files).

How to use the viewer is described in the “Log viewer” section of the Links page.